Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement

Identifieur interne : 001F90 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001F89; suivant : 001F91

Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement

Auteurs : Reinhilde Jacobs ; Marc Quirynen

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:DC04A5031E864234BA3653A6B14C65B47C077D80

Abstract

Intra‐oral and panoramic radiographs are most frequently used in oral health care. Yet, the inherent nature of jaws and teeth renders three‐dimensional diagnosis essential, especially in relation to oral surgery. Nowadays, this can be accomplished by dental cone beam computed tomography, which provides high‐quality images at low radiation doses and low costs. Nonetheless, the effective dose ranges of cone beam computed tomography machines may easily vary from 10 to 1000 μSv, this being equivalent to two to 200 panoramic radiographs, even for similar presurgical indications. Moreover, the diagnostic image quality varies massively among available machines and parameter settings. Apart from the radiodiagnostic possibilities, dental cone beam computed tomography may offer a vast therapeutic potential, including opportunities for surgical guidance and further prosthetic rehabilitation via computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing solutions. These additional options may definitely explain part of the success of cone beam computed tomography for oral implant placement. In conclusion, dental cone beam computed tomography imaging could be justified for oral implant‐related diagnosis, planning and transfer to surgical and further prosthetic treatment, but guidelines for justification and cone beam computed tomography optimization remain mandatory.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/prd.12051


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DC04A5031E864234BA3653A6B14C65B47C077D80</idno>
<date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/prd.12051</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DC04A5031E864234BA3653A6B14C65B47C077D80/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006D14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006D14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006D14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000202</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000202</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0906-6713:2014:Jacobs R:dental:cone:beam</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001F97</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001F90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001F90</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">PERIODONTOLOGY 2000</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0757</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">66</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="203">203</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="213">213</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope>
<date type="published" when="2014-10">2014-10</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Intra‐oral and panoramic radiographs are most frequently used in oral health care. Yet, the inherent nature of jaws and teeth renders three‐dimensional diagnosis essential, especially in relation to oral surgery. Nowadays, this can be accomplished by dental cone beam computed tomography, which provides high‐quality images at low radiation doses and low costs. Nonetheless, the effective dose ranges of cone beam computed tomography machines may easily vary from 10 to 1000 μSv, this being equivalent to two to 200 panoramic radiographs, even for similar presurgical indications. Moreover, the diagnostic image quality varies massively among available machines and parameter settings. Apart from the radiodiagnostic possibilities, dental cone beam computed tomography may offer a vast therapeutic potential, including opportunities for surgical guidance and further prosthetic rehabilitation via computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing solutions. These additional options may definitely explain part of the success of cone beam computed tomography for oral implant placement. In conclusion, dental cone beam computed tomography imaging could be justified for oral implant‐related diagnosis, planning and transfer to surgical and further prosthetic treatment, but guidelines for justification and cone beam computed tomography optimization remain mandatory.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F90 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001F90 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:DC04A5031E864234BA3653A6B14C65B47C077D80
   |texte=   Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022